Thursday, 28 June 2018

MANAGER'S DILEMMA!


Once I came across a fable where a girl with phenomenal skill used to weave excusive silk, which drew envy from her own folks in the village she lived and even when they doubted her exquisite quality, they only loved to mention the name of the Goddess of yarn, only with a vile to belittle her prodigy, whom the only reckon as supreme in weaving, unmatched to human endeavor, which only evidently manifest their utmost efforts to belittle her talent in any pretext.
But, the girl no longer desirous to buy that any supernatural power could able to make better weaving than any human’s efficacy. By noticing her emphatic expression, obviously according to fable, the Goddess of weaving appeared before her in disguise, tried to pursue her, that human have limitation and they are longer any match to any Goddess. But, the poor girl, who was firm on her views and ability, challenged any Goddess, if at all they exist to surpass her capacity. Then the Goddess accepted her challenge and the little girl performed amazingly, ignoring God’s talent more superior than any human beings diligence and sincere effort.
The concern Goddess became furious by noticing her arrogance. Her resolute faith on her own skill and its dispensation made the very God jealous. She cursed her that she should be paid for her arrogance and pride and out of her superior status she made her compelled to arrest on her own yarn and as such there is a myth that cobweb came into being, and we ordinary mass feel sheer pity for the price the little girl paid, just to substantiate that she lives not out of anybody’s mercy, but by her own diligence, effort, by virtue of which she acquired such finesse.
But, I wonder, perhaps it is the common trend of human beings, where when a person superior in position, feels his position is in threat out of the subordinate’s talent and skill, surely he or she will express a vile intention to humiliate and forced her or him to quit the organization out of the superior’s vile attitude and nefarious intention. Inevitably, these superiors would sacrifice the diligent subordinate to retain themselves in the corridor of power and eventually bring disrepute to his or her organization.  The person, who is a rare prodigy, quite reasonably ignore the superior’s whim and caprice, as they are dedicated to the organization where they are rendering their services, not to any individual. Naturally, their pride is their only wealth which they cherish and that also they acquired, not being out of someone’s mercy.  So, it is quite natural, that why they should endure superior’s whims and caprice, who are practically responsible to create a toxic environment where the human resources could thrive with vigor?
This alacrity of few vicious managers who reckon themselves as mercenaries and whenever the conflict of interests emerge, they unhesitatingly resort to unfair means only to retain themselves in the helm of the organization. Not recognizing their limitations and their unwillingness to give due weight-age to the deserving quality for their instant gain and fame, perhaps only accelerate the decline of growth to the concern organization, forcing the prospective human resources to quit the organization. I guess, nobody loves to be humiliated and ignored.
I am in utter doubt, how these people are still exist who precisely live out of their arrogance, moment they acquire the position of height and that also out of their talent, not out of anybody’s mercy. Why these managers are prevalent in the corporate world? Why we love to pay tribute to someone’s talent which is purely ephemeral when are dwelling in a global village where always there is an innovation and making a sea change to our lifestyle too!
I knew numerous managers who are solely responsible for the downfall of their organization. They simply ignored and declined to offer due weight-age to the human resources he or she is dwelling with. I cannot understand what is the harm of recognizing one’s prodigy? Is not it should be treated as an organization;s imperative, which eventually yield rich dividend to the organization itself? I wonder, whether they are truly managers, or an element to cause only massacre?

No comments:

Post a Comment